Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65907 (PNJ)

SHRI BHAGWAN AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/18329/2018 · 2025-07-11

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 207(1) CWP-18329-2018 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.07.2025 Shri Bhagwan and others ...Petitioner(s) VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...Respondents 207(2) CWP-19147-2018 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.07.2025 Umed Singh and others ...Petitioner(s) VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...Respondents 207(3) CWP-19091-2018 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.07.2025 Bhalle Ram and others ...Petitioner(s) VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...Respondents 207(4) CWP-20456-2018 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.07.2025 Din Dayal ...Petitioner(s) VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...Respondents 207(5) CWP-21324-2018 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.07.2025 Om Parkash and others ...Petitioner(s) VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...Respondents MANGAL SINGH 2025.07.18 18:23 I am the author of this document 2 207 CWP-18329-2018 (O&M) and 12 other connected cases 207(6) CWP-22489-2018 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.07.2025 Prem Singh and others ...Petitioner(s) VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...Respondents 207(7) CWP-21337-2018 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.07.2025 Sombir Singh ...Petitioner(s) VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...Respondents 207(8) COCP-3871-2018 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.07.2025 Bhalle Ram and others ...Petitioner(s) VERSUS Sh. Anurag Rastogi, IAS, and others ...Respondents 207(9) COCP-3870-2018 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.07.2025 Prem Singh and others ...Petitioner(s) VERSUS Sh. Anurag Rastogi, IAS, and others ...Respondents 207(10) CWP-9956-2018 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.07.2025 Sant Ram ...Petitioner(s) VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...Respondents MANGAL SINGH 2025.07.18 18:23 I am the author of this document 3 207 CWP-18329-2018 (O&M) and 12 other connected cases 207(11) CWP-26691-2018 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.07.2025 Zile Singh ...Petitioner(s) VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...Respondents 207(12) CWP-23071-2018 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.07.2025 Chattar Singh and others ...Petitioner(s) VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...Respondents 207(13) CWP-9468-2019 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.07.2025 Joginder Singh and another ...Petitioner(s) VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. Ravinder Malik (Ravi), Advocate for the petitioner(s) in CWP-19091-2018, CWP-21324-2018, CWP-22489-2018, COCP-3871-2018, COCP-3870-2018 and CWP-26691-2018. Mr. R.S. Sangwan, Advocate for the petitioner(s) in CWP-19147-2018, CWP-20456-2018, and CWP-9956-2018. Ms. Priyanka Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner(s) in CWP-18329-2018. Mr. Manoj Chahal, Advocate for the petitioner(s) in CWP-21337-2018. Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner(s) in CWP-9468-2019. Mr. Karamdeep, Advocate for Mr. B.R. Rana, Advocate for the petitioners in CWP-23071-2018. MANGAL SINGH 2025.07.18 18:23 I am the author of this document 4 207 CWP-18329-2018 (O&M) and 12 other connected cases Mr. Tapan Kumar, DAG Haryana. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) 1. Involving identical issues for grant of Technical Pay Scale, its withdrawal and re-fixation of pay of the petitioner(s), all these writ petitions are being decided by a common order. 2. The petitioner(s) have approached this Court aggrieved of the orders passed by their respective authorities withdrawing the technical pay scale(s) granted to them and directing the re-fixation of pay in view of Section 4 of “The Haryana (Abolition of Distinction of Pay Scale Between Technical and Non-Technical Posts) Act, 2014”. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner(s) contend that the issue involved in the present case is covered by the judgment dated 25.03.2025 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in CWP-11710-2014 titled as ‘Sarbans Singh and others Vs. State of Haryana and others’ and other connected case(s). 4. Learned State counsel does not dispute the aforesaid factual position. 4. In view of the above, the impugned orders under challenge in these writ petitions withdrawing the technical pay scale(s) are set aside and the respondent(s)-authorities are directed to re-consider the claim of the petitioner(s) in accordance with law as well as in view of the judgment dated 25.03.2025 passed by Division Bench of this Court in Sarbans Singh and others (supra) expeditiously and preferably within a period of 03 months. MANGAL SINGH 2025.07.18 18:23 I am the author of this document 5 207 CWP-18329-2018 (O&M) and 12 other connected cases 5. Needless to mention that if upon considering the claim of the petitioner(s), in case, any monetary benefit is found due and payable to the petitioner(s), the same shall be disbursed in their favour within a further period of 02 month, failing which, the erring officials shall be liable to pay a cost of Rs.50,000/- to each petitioner. 6. The civil writ petitions are disposed of in above terms. 7. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that he does not wish to press COCP-3871-2018 and COCP-3870-2018. 8. Ordered accordingly. 9. Pending civil misc. application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 11.07.2025 JUDGE Mangal Singh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MANGAL SINGH 2025.07.18 18:23 I am the author of this document