Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6590 (JHR)

MERAJ MIAN ALIAS MERAJ ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1685/2025 · 2025-08-04

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:JHHC:21729 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1685 of 2025 ------ Meraj Mian @ Meraj Ansari, aged about 21 years, S/o Chirauddin Mian, R/o Village-Raghunathpur, P.O.+ P.S.-Khaga, District-Deoghar … … Petitioner -Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ------ For the Petitioner : M/s. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the State : M/s. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Special P.P. ----- 03/04.08.2025 I.A. No. 9873 of 2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Interlocutory Application. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, this Interlocutory Application is dismissed as withdrawn. B.A. No. 1685 of 2025 Heard the parties 2. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No. 139 of 2024, for the offences registered under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 66B, 66C, 66D, and 84(C) of the I.T. Act, pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Deoghar. 3. On 25.12.2024, at about 09:00 a.m., Cyber Police, Deoghar, on the basis of confidential information that cyber criminals had assembled near Turi Pahari, raided the place of occurrence and apprehended this petitioner alongwith co-accused persons. On search, two mobile phones and SIM cards were recovered from the possession of the petitioner. 4. It was submitted that the no victim has turned up to claim that the petitioner had cheated anyone. 5. In view of the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to release the petitioner, on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail stands rejected at this stage. (Ambuj Nath, J.) Nandini/- Uploaded