HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No.2124 of 2024 Jamil …..….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Ankurit Raj David, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Rangoli Purohit, Brief Holder for the State. With First Bail Application No.9 of 2025 Asgar …..….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. D.C.S. Rawat, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Rangoli Purohit, Brief Holder for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Since both these bail applications arise from one and the same FIR, they are being heard together and decided by this common order. 2. The Jamil and Asgar are in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No.88 of 2018, dated 22.04.2018, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 332, 353, 342, 504 IPC, Police Station ITI, District Udham Singh Nagar. The applicants have sought their release on bail. 2 3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants would submit that it is a no injury case. 5. This fact is admitted by the learned State counsel. 6. Having considered, this Court is of the view that these are the cases fit for bail and the applicants deserve to be enlarged on bail. 7. The bail applications are allowed. 8. Let the applicants be released on bail, on their executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, by each one of them, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 11.02.2025 Sanjay