Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65885 (ALL)

SURAJ KUMAR v. UNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHER

WRIC/18553/2025 · 2025-09-15

Amitabh Kumar Rai, Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 18553 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Ramesh Chandra Pandey, learned counsel for the respondents and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. Petitioner's application for issuance of passport apparently has been kept pending on account of his implication in the N.C.R. Reliance is placed upon the Division Bench judgment of this Court in Writ-C No.41540 of 2023 (Pawan Kumar Rajbhar Vs. Union of India & others), in order to contend that mere pendency of criminal cases cannot be a ground to deny issuance of passport to the petitioner. 3. In the facts of the case, we permit the petitioner to approach the concerned court where the aforesaid cases are pending for grant of no objection certificate by the court concerned so that the passport authorities can take a fresh decision in the matter relating to issuance of the petitioner's passport. 4. Petitioner, therefore, is at liberty to approach the concerned court which shall act in terms of the law laid down in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar (supra) and based upon its decision, the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dharmraj Chaudhary, Pradeep Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C., Ramesh Chandra Pandey Suraj Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 3 Other .....Respondent(s) passport authorities would do the needful by passing appropriate orders within a further period of two months, thereafter. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed off. September 16, 2025 Sumaira WRIC No. 18553 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad