Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65870 (ALL)

GAUSHUL AND 6 OTHERS v. State of UP AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/8546/2024 · 2025-10-05

Devendra Singh I, Rajiv Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8546 of 2024 Court No. - 46 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J. 1. Heard Ms. Yamini Singh, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Pramod Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, Ms. Yamini Singh, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Pramod Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a statement at the bar that in the instant case investigation has already been concluded and charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioners, as such, present writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned AGA does not dispute the aforesaid fact. 4. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. October 6, 2025 ADY Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pramod Kumar Dwivedi, Surya Bhan Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Vikrant Gupta (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Gaushul And 6 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMAR DEEP YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad