BHASKAR KAUTIK CHAVAN v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
CP/60/2019 · 2025-07-03
Shri N B Suryawanshi, Shri Sandipkumar C More
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6587 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6587 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(1) 917 CP-60.2019.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 60 OF 2019 IN WP/12528/2015 BHASKAR KAUTIK CHAVAN VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS … Mr. Yogesh Jadhav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.J. Salgare, A.G.P. for respondent – State. …
CORAM :
NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.
DATED :
3 JULY 2025
ORDER:-
1. Learned A.G.P. has submitted that the order is complied with and encroachments are removed.
2. Learned advocate for the petitioner disputes the said position stating that encroachments in respect of which the civil proceedings are pending, are yet not removed.
3. Rightly so, as the Civil Court is ceased with the matter, after the decision of Civil Court, appropriate steps will be taken by the concerned Authorities for removal of encroachments in terms of the orders passed by Civil Court.
4. In view of compliance of the order, contempt petition is
disposed of.
(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI) JUDGE JUDGE VD_Dhirde