MUKTABAI BAPURAO THAKUR AND ANR v. RANGNATHRAO GANPATRAO DESHMUKH
SA/204/1999 · 2025-08-18
Shri Shailesh P Brahme
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6586 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6586 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
26 SA 204 OF 1999.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 26 SECOND APPEAL NO. 204 OF 1999 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2221 OF 1999 IN SA/204/1999 MUKTABAI BAPURAO THAKUR AND ANR VERSUS RANGNATHRAO GANPATRAO DESHMUKH ... Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S. M. Kulkarni Advocate for Respondents : Mr. Anil Kasliwal CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 18.08.2025 PER COURT : It is informed by the learned counsel Mr. S.N. Kulkarni for the appellant that despite written communication, there is no response from his clients. Learned counsel Mr. Kasliwal also informs that his client is also not in touch with him.
2. Second Appeal is dismissed for default.
3. Pending Civil Application also disposed of.
( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.)
mkd/- 1/1 2025:BHC-AUG:22468