Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65857 (PNJ)

RAM CHANDER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/16371/2025 · 2025-05-29

Jagmohan Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

` CWP-16371-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 141 CWP-16371-2025 Date of Decision: 29.05.2025 Ram Chander …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Nischal Chetanya Manchanda, Advocate, Mr. Devyansh Advocate and Mr. Saksham Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent to consider him for regularization in view of judgment dated 22.01.2025 (Annexure P-2) passed by this Court. 2. The petitioner claims that he is working as Sweeper for last 39 years with respondent-Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam. He is eligible for regularization. His case is squarely covered by judgment dated 22.01.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by this Court. 3. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, who on advance notice is present in Court on behalf of respondent-State, assures the Court that competent authority would consider petitioner’s claim MOHIT KUMAR 2025.05.29 18:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgement. ` CWP-16371-2025 -2- and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law within six months from today. 4. In the wake of statement of learned State counsel, the present petition stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 29.05.2025 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHIT KUMAR 2025.05.29 18:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgement.