Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65841 (ALL)

PRATIMA TRIPATHI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/18994/2025 · 2025-09-15

Amitabh Kumar Rai, Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 18994 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. After arguing the matter at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that present petition may be dismissed as not pressed as the petitioner wants to avail alternative remedy available in law. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy. September 16, 2025 Mohit Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijai Shanker Tripathi, Vinod Shankar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Kumar Gupta (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Pratima Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad