Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6584 (UTT)

SATENDRA KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/1410/2025 · 2025-05-16

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 18 WPMS No.1410 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Shubhr Rastogi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State. Heard. The petitioner runs a Fair Price Shop. On 03.02.2025, an inspection was done of the shop run by the petitioner and it was found that there were grave irregularities. Thereafter, the license of the petitioner was suspended and proceedings initiated. The petitioner challenges those orders. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that though his license has been suspended, but the petitioner had already filed his objections on 20.03.2025 to the respondent no.2, the District Magistrate, Haridwar (Annexure No.4 to the writ petition), which has yet not been decided. He seeks directions to the respondent no. 2, the District Magistrate, Haridwar, to decide the objections filed by the petitioner in a time bound manner. Learned State Counsel would submit that the objections filed by the petitioner shall be decided within a period of six weeks. The Court takes on record the statement given by learned State Counsel. The writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondent no. 2 to decide the objections filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks. (Ravindra Maithani J.) 16.05.2025 RV