Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6584 (CHH)

ANUPA PAINKRA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/846/2025 · 2025-01-30

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:5576 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 846 of 2025 1 - Anupa Painkra D/o Late Salman Singh Aged About 30 Years Working On The Post Of Patwari, Permanent R/o Fundurdihari Chowk, Godhanpur, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). 2 - Suman Bhagat W/o Vimal Kumar Bhagat, Aged About 43 Years Working On The Post Of Patwari, Permanent R/o Rajendra Nagar, Lakadapara, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). 3 - Ganesh Dutt Mishra S/o Late Shivprasad Mishra Aged About 43 Years Working On The Post Of Patwari, Parmanent R/o Sattipara Chowk, Nehru Ward, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). 4 - Pankaj Jaiswal S/o Narendra Jaiswal Aged About 33 Years Working On The Post Of Patwari, Permanent R/o Subhash Nagar, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). 5 - Satish Vinay Ekka S/o Egnasus Ekka Aged About 42 Years Working On The Post Of Patwari, Permanent R/o Patel Para, Fundudihari, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). 6 - Punam Say D/o Samundra Say Aged About 40 Years Working On The Post Of Patwari, Permanent R/o Gandhi Nagar, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). 7 - Shrawan Kumar Pandey S/o Late Ram Suresh Pandey, Aged About 46 Years Working On The Post Of Patwari, Permanent R/o Bauripara, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). 8 - Uttam Kumar Gupta S/o Heeralal Gupta Aged About 33 Years Working On The Post Of Patwari, Permanent R/o Shivdhari Colony, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). ... Petitioners VISHAKHA BEOHAR Digitally signed by VISHAKHA BEOHAR 2 versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur, Atal Ngar, P.O. And P.S. Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 2 - The Commissioner Land Records, State Of Chhattisgarh, Indrawati Bhawan, 1st Floor, Block-2, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.). 3 - The Director, Land Records, State Of Chhattisgrh, Indrawati Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.). 4 - The High Level Investigation Committee, Through Shri K.D. Kunjam, Special Secretary, Food Civil Suppliers And Consumer Protection Department, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.). ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioners :- Mr. V.K. Pandey, Advocate For State :- Mr. Akansha Verma, P.L. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order On Board 30.01.2025 1. Heard on I.A. No.01, which is an application for exemption from filing of typed copy of certain documents. 2. On due consideration, the same is allowed as the petition itself is being disposed of. 3. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 issue notices to the respondents, returnable 3 within early date of hearing. 10.2 direct to issue a letter for training of the petitioners for the post of Revenue Inspector within stipulated period. 10.3 direct the respondent authorities to give promotion on the post of Revenue Inspector after completion of training giving them seniority from the date of selection. 10.4 issue any other relief(s)/ order(s)/ direction(s) in favour of petitioners, which deemed fit & proper in the facts & circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice. 10.4 Cost of the petition.” 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners were selected for promotional post of Revenue Inspector. Even after selection for the post of Revenue Inspector, for which a training was organized wherein the petitioners were required to participate, however even after their selection, they were not being sent for training, as such the petitioners have filed this petition with a limited prayer that the respondent authorities may kindly be directed to send them for training of Revenue Inspector which is required to be done as they were selected for the post of Revenue Inspector vide Annexure-P/5 in Departmental exam. 5. Learned counsel for the State fairly submits that she has taken instructions from the authority concern and decision will be taken by the authorities within a period of 15 days in respect of sending the petitioners for training. 6. Be that as it may, since the petitioners were selected for the post 4 of Revenue Inspector and therefore, it is incommbandent upon the respondent authorities to send them for training of Revenue Inspector and it is expected that the decision would be taken within a short period and petitioners will be send for training immediately so that they may avail training in respect of Revenue Inspector, which is part and partial of their service. 7. Accordingly the respondent authorities are directed to pass necessary order in respect of the grievance mention by the petitioner. 8. With aforesaid observation(s)/direction(s) instant writ petition is disposed off. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Vishakha