CHAITALI VASUDEO NEMADE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
WP/14031/2025 · 2025-11-25
Shri Hiten S Venegavkar, Smt Vibha Kankanwadi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 65824 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 65824 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 14031 OF 2025 Chaitali Vasudeo Nemade VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others Mr. A. M. Phule, AGP for respondent-State CORAM : Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi & Hiten S. Venegavkar, JJ. DATE : 25th November, 2025 PER COURT :-
1. Learned Advocate for petitioner is absent. However, perusal of the petition would show that the petitioner seeks direction against respondent No. 3, Education Officer to decide the proposal sent by respondent Management.
2. Learned AGP waives notice for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. No necessity to issue notice to respondent Nos. 4 and 5. Upon instructions from respondent No. 3, learned AGP makes statement that said proposal would be decided within a period of eight weeks from today. We accept the said statement as undertaking and dispose of the writ petition by directing respondent No. 3 to decide the proposal in respect of petitioner filed by respondent Nos. 4 and 5 within a period of eight weeks from today. (Hiten S. Venegavkar, J.) (Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, J.) B. S. Joshi 947-WP-14031-2025.odt 1 of 1 2025:BHC-AUG:32399-DB