Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19960 of 2023 Court No. - 46 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.
1. Heard Sri Saket Singh, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
2. At the very outset, Sri Saket Singh, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the bar that in the instant case investigation has already been concluded and charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioners, as such, present writ petition has become infructuous.
3. Learned AGA does not dispute the aforesaid fact.
4. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. October 6, 2025 ADY Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjeev Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Rampravesh Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMAR DEEP YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad