BASHIR AHMAD SHAH @SHAHEEN v. MS.MANDEEP KAUR(IAS) COMMR/SECTY AND ORS
CCP(S)/48/2025 · 2026-04-08
Sanjay Dhar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 658 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 658 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 37 Regular Cause List.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CCP(S) 48/2025 in[WP(C) 229/2024] CM(1411/2026).
BASHIR AHMAD SHAH @SHAHEEN(SENIOR CITIZEN).
…Petitioner (s)
Through: Ms. Tabinda, Advocate vice
Mr. Shuja ul Haq, Advocate.
VERSUS
MS.MANDEEP KAUR(IAS) COMMR/SECTY AND ORS.
Through: Ms. Naubahar, Assisting Counsel vice Mr. Bikram Deep Singh, Dy. AG.
…Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE.
ORDER 08-04-2026
01.
Through the medium of the present petition, the petitioner seeks implementation of order dated 7th of February, 2024 passed by the Writ Court, whereby the respondents were directed to accord consideration to the claim of the petitioner and pass a speaking order with regard to the release of pensionary benefits.
02.
Statement of Facts stands filed by the respondents. The same is accompanied by Consideration Order dated 18th of March, 2026, whereby the respondents, after considering the claim of the petitioner, have refused to release gratuity and leave salary of the petitioner on account of pendency of enquiry report and FIRs against the petitioner.
03.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner shall challenge the consideration order passed by the respondents by way of appropriate proceedings. Her statement is taken on record.
04.
In view of the above, nothing further survives for adjudication in the present petition and the contempt proceedings are accordingly closed. The petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to challenge the
consideration order by way of appropriate proceedings.
(Sanjay Dhar)
Judge
SRINAGAR 08-04-2026 Showkat Khan