COCP No.2327 of 202 IN TH 142 DR. JYOTI KUM Vs DR. SUMITA MIS CORAM: HON' Present: Mr. P Mr. S for th Mr. M Mr. D Mr. H the C HARKESH MAN 1. Lear the Treasury identification/cert within one week t 2. In vi counsel for the pe 3. Dism 4. How period, as per the contempt petition liable to pay a su the petitioner tow listing of revival a February 11, 20 Atik Wheth Wheth 2024 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No. Date of De I KUMAR A MISRA, IAS ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Mr. Pawan Kumar Jangra, Advocate Mr. Sanjeev Bhar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Dadwal, Asstt. A.G., Ha Mr. D.S. Maan, D.A.G., Haryana. Mr. H.S. Oberoi, Advocate the CAG (Accountant General, Hary **** MANUJA, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel submits that in ury Officer, Gohana on 27.02 n/certificate, the remaining benefits week thereafter. In view of the aforesaid undertakin the petitioner does not press the presen Dismissed as not pressed. Rule stand However, in case the needful is not er the undertaking, the petitioner wou etition and in that eventuality, the y a sum of Rs.50,000/- as cost(s) from er towards litigation expenses, imm vival application. (HA , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH P No.2327 of 2024 (O&M) of Decision: 11.02.2025 ......Petitioner ....Respondent ESH MANUJA ocate and G., Haryana with , Haryana). that in case the petitioner appear befo 27.02.2025 to submit her nefits shall be released in her favou ertaking by the respondent(s), learne present petition. stands discharged. is not done within the aforementione er would be at liberty to seek revival o the erring/concerned officer would b s) from his/her own pocket in favour o , immediately i.e. on the first date o (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE 1 r before er life r favour learned ntioned vival of ould be avour of date of MOHMED ATIK 2025.02.11 18:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment