Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:HHC:7043 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA RSA No 134 of 2016
Date of decision: 21st March, 2025 Hukum Chand Sharma …Appellant Versus Dalip Singh …Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Appellant: Appellant is stated to have expired.
For the Respondent: Ms. Amita Chandel, Advocate vice Ms.Rachna Kuthiala, Advocate. Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge (Oral) Ms. Anita Mokta, Advocate, under instructions of learned original counsel Ms.Anu Tuli, Advocate, submits that for taking appropriate steps to substitute deceased appellant and to continue the present appeal, registered letters were sent to legal heirs of deceased appellant, but they are not coming forward to take steps for their substitution in place of deceased appellant and thus, it is not possible for the counsel to take appropriate steps on account of death of appellant. In view of aforesaid submissions, it is apparent that legal heirs of deceased appellant are not interested to contest the matter. In
( 2025:HHC:7043 ) view of death of appellant and the non-substitution of his legal heirs, appeal is dismissed as abated as well as for want of prosecution.
(Vivek Singh Thakur), 21st March, 2025 Judge. (MS) 2