Arb. Appln. No.372 of 2024 THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05.03.2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Arb. Appln. No.372 of 2024 Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co. Ltd. Rep. by its Authorised Signatory Applicant Vs K. Abu Respondent For Applicant : Mr. D Pradeep Kumar - - - - - Despite several adjournments granted to enable the Advocate Commissioner to execute the Warrant of Commission, the Advocate Commissioner could not repossess the vehicle, since the vehicle could not be located. Till date, the vehicle has not been repossessed by the Advocate Commissioner appointed by this Court. 2. No useful would be served, if this application is allowed to be kept pending when the vehicle is not traceable. Accordingly, this application is closed. However, liberty is granted to the applicant to file a fresh application seeking for the very same relief once the vehicle is 1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb. Appln. No.372 of 2024 located. While considering the fresh application, this Court will consider appointing the very same Advocate Commissioner, who was appointed earlier by this Court in this application. This Court shall also consider adjusting the initial remuneration paid to the Advocate Commissioner in this application, while considering the payment of remuneration to the Advocate Commissioner, when this Court decides the fresh application. 05.03.2025 vsi2 2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb. Appln. No.372 of 2024 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. vsi2 Arb. Appln. No.372 of 2024 05.03.2025 3/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis