IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (121) Priti & Anr. State of UT and Ors. CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN, 1. the Constitution of India, directing the respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of private respondents. 2. the matter has been resolved between the parties and does not wish to press the same. 3. addresses were mentioned in this petition and the petitioners should be careful before filing any document in the Court of law. 4. withdrawal of the present petition, the same is dismissed as without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case June 02, 2025 manju IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Priti & Anr. Versus State of UT and Ors.. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Ms. Monika Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Sandeep Vashisht, APP, UT, Chandigarh. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present second petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the from the hands of private respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the outset, submits that the matter has been resolved between the parties and does not wish to press Learned counsel for the State has submitted that the wrong addresses were mentioned in this petition and the petitioners should be careful before filing any document in the Court of law. However, since the counsel for the petitioners praying for rawal of the present petition, the same is dismissed as without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case June 02, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-5905-2025 Date of Decision:- 02.06.2025 ……Petitioners ……Respondents ALOK JAIN , Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sandeep Vashisht, APP, UT, Chandigarh. petition has been filed under Article 226 of praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the from the hands of private respondents. counsel for the petitioners, at the outset, submits that the matter has been resolved between the parties and does not wish to press Learned counsel for the State has submitted that the wrong addresses were mentioned in this petition and the petitioners should be careful before filing any document in the Court of law. However, since the counsel for the petitioners praying for rawal of the present petition, the same is dismissed as withdrawn without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 02.06.2025 s ……Respondents petition has been filed under Article 226 of praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the counsel for the petitioners, at the outset, submits that the matter has been resolved between the parties and does not wish to press Learned counsel for the State has submitted that the wrong addresses were mentioned in this petition and the petitioners should be However, since the counsel for the petitioners praying for withdrawn MANJU 2025.06.02 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document