Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6576 (AP)

YELCHURI VENKATA SAI TARUN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/3398/2025 · 2025-02-10

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 3398 OF 2025 Between: Yelchuri Venkata Sai Tarun Kumar, S/o.Yelchuri Satyanarayana 25 years, R/o.D.No.9-20-39, Railway Road, 0pp. Bank of Baroda, Kavali, Nellore District -524 201. aged about ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi Guntur District. 2. Superintendent of Police, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District. 3. Circle Inspector of Police, Kandukuru, SPSR Nellore District. 4. Station House Officer, Kondapuram Police Station, Kondapuram, SPSR Nellore District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in calling the petitioner to the Police Station without there being any crime registered or pending for investigating against the Petitioner herein without following due process of law as arbitrary, illegal and violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under Art 14 and 21 of the -1 Constitution of India and 0interfere with the petitioners life and limb. consequently direct the respondents not to lA NOf 1 OF 2Q2fi Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Petitioner to the Police station without following the due respondents not to call the procedure of law as contemplated under BNS pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER ir IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) APHC010061482025 EES [3368] S MONDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 3398/2025 Between: Yelchuri Venkata Sai Tarun Kumar ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: I.SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “to issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in calling the petitioner to the Police Station without there being any crime registered or pending for investigating against the Petitioner herein without following due process of law as arbitrary illegal and violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under Art 14 AND 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners life and iimb and pass such...” 2 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned 2. Additional Government Pleader appearing for the State. Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the State on written instructions would submit that the preliminary enquiry of the Police would reveal that it is a money dispute and they will not interfere in this matter. 3. Submissions made by learned Assistant Government 4. Pleader are placed on record. In that view of the matter, this Court is of the considered opinion that the Writ Petition can be closed at the stage of admission itself, without going into merits of the case, by directing the respondent/Police to follow due procedure established under law. 5. Accordingly, Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. 6. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/- N. NAGAMMA assistant REGIS^^R SECTION OFFICER //true copy// I To, Chamarty Advocate [OPUCl Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] CC to Sri Sai Gangadhar 1. One 2. Two CCS to GP for 3 Three CD Copiss Home, High Court of TF HIGH COURT DATED:10/02/2025 ORDER WP.No.3398 of 2025 S’ 2 5 FEB 2025 s ^ . Current iiecuon CLOSING THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS