- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17230-DB RFA No. 100142 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 100142 OF 2022 (PAR/POS) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. NALINI W/O. ASHOK DODDAMANI, AGE: 68 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O. YAMUNA NIVAS, BEHIND WOMENS COLLEGE, R.T. NAGAR, CHIKKODI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591201. 2. SRI. VINAY S/O. ASHOK DODDAMANI, AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: PVT. SERVICE, R/O. YAMUNA NIVAS, BEHIND WOMENS COLLEGE, R.T. NAGAR, CHIKKODI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591201. 3. SRI. VIJAY S/O. ASHOK DODDAMANI, AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE, R/O. VISHWESHWARAYYA TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY, ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT, JANA SANGAMA, MACHHE, DIST: BELAGAVI-590018. 4. SMT. VEENA W/O. VEERANDRA BHOJ, AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O. H.NO.66-B, II BLOCK, 22ND CROSS, RAJAJI NAGAR, BENGALURU-560010. REP. BY HER SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SRI. VINAY S/O. ASHOK DODDAMANI, MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.12.05 10:01:32 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17230-DB RFA No. 100142 of 2022 AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: PVT. SERVICE, R/O. YAMUNA NIVAS, BEHIND WOMENS COLLEGE, R.T.NAGAR, CHIKKODI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591201. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SACHIN C.ANGADI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. SAIPRASAD S/O. BHUJANGRAO DODDAMANI SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR’s., 1(A). SHOBHA W/O. SAIPRASAD DODDAMANI AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O. H. NO.101, VIJAYANAGAR EXTENSION, HUBBALLI-580032. 1(B). ROHIT S/O. SAIPRASAD DODDAMANI, AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: MERCANTILE ENGINEER, R/O. H. NO.101, VIJAYANAGAR EXTENSION, HUBBALLI-580032. 1(C). RUTUJA D/O. SAIPRASAD DODDAMANI, AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC: SBI EMPLOYEE, R/O. H. NO.101, VIJAYANAGAR EXTENSION, HUBBALLI-580032. 1(D). SMT. SUSHEELABAI D/O. BHUJANGRAO DODDAMANI, AGE: 78 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O. H. NO.101, VIJAYANAGAR EXTENSION, HUBBALLI-580032. 3. SRI. PRATISHKUMAR S/O. BHUJANGRAO DODDAMANI, AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: PVT.SERVICE, R/O. H. NO.101, VIJAYANAGAR EXTENSION, HUBBALLI-580032. 4. SRI. RAJENDRAPRASAD S/O. BHUJANGRAO DODDAMANI, SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR’s., - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17230-DB RFA No. 100142 of 2022 4(A). SUJATA W/O. AJENDRAPRASAD DODDAMANI AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: DAILY WAGES EMPLOYEE, R/O. OFFICE OF TAHASILDAR, HUBBALLI-580032. 4(B). SRINIVAS S/O. RAJENDRAPRASAD DODDAMANI, AGE: 14 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O. C/O. SUJATA DODDAMANI, OFFICE OF TAHASILDAR, HUBBALLI-580032, SINCE MINOR IN AGE R/BY HIS NATURAL MOTHER, BEST NEXT FRIEND AND MINOR GUARDIAN RESPONDENT NO.4(A) SUJATA W/O. RAJENDRAPRASAD DODDAMANI, AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: DAILY WAGES EMPLOYEE, R/O. OFFICE OF TAHASILDAR, HUBBALLI-580020. 5. SRI. LAKSHMAN S/O. MAHADEV SAMBHAJI, AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. WARD NO.14, BEHIND WOMEN’S COLLEGE, CHIKKODI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591201. 6. SRI. SADASHIV S/O. LAKSHMAN KHADDANAVAR, AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. WARD NO.14, BEHIND WOMEN’S COLLEGE, CHIKKODI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESH WODEYAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1(A) TO R1(C), R2, R3 AND R4(A); R4(B) IS MINOR REPRESENTED BY R4(A); SRI. P.R.BENTUR AND SRI. SHIVAPRASAD S.PATIL, ADVOCATES FOR R5 AND R6) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 AND ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.03.2020 PASSED IN O.S.NO.117/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, HUBBALLI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE SUIT FILED FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION AND ETC. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17230-DB RFA No. 100142 of 2022 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS) The appellants and the learned counsel for the appellants have filed a memo dated 02.12.2025 stating that appellants are not ready to prosecute this appeal. Therefore, leave of this court is sought to withdraw the appeal. 2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. 3. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. 4. The office is directed to return the TCR to the trial court. 5. In view of dismissal of the appeal, pending I.A’s if any, do not survive for consideration and the same are disposed of. Sd/- (R.DEVDAS) JUDGE Sd/- (B. MURALIDHARA PAI) JUDGE MBS/Ct:vh