Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.634 of 2021 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3 of 2019 ======================================================
1. The State of Bihar the Principal Secretary, Department of Registration, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The District Magistrate, Lakhisarai. 3. The Registrar, Registry Office, Lakhisarai. ... ... Appellant/s Versus
1. Mrs. Poonam Kumari Wife of Ganesh Kumar Resident of Village- Jaitpur, Police Station- Barahiya, District- Lakhisarai. 2. Binod Kumar Son of Late Ramchandra Singh Resident of Village- Jaitpur, Police Station- Barahiya, District- Lakhisarai. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Rewti Kant Raman (A.C. To S.C.11) For the Respondent/s : None ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) Date : 04-03-2025 Heard I.A. No. 1 of 2021. 2. There is a delay of about 667 days in filing the present Letters Patent Appeal No. 634 of 2021. The cause of action accrued to the appellant in filing the present LPA No. 634 of 2021 is 03.01.2020. If the COVID-19 period is taken into consideration from 15.03.2020 to 30.09.2021 in that event delay would be about one month and few days. Patna High Court L.P.A No.634 of 2021 dt.04-03-2025 2/3
3. In the light of these facts and circumstances delay of about 667 days in filing LPA No. 634 of 2021 is condoned. Accordingly, I.A. No. 01 of 2021 stands allowed. 4. With the consent of learned counsel for the appellant, matter is taken up for final disposal. 5. The Appellants-State have assailed the order of the learned Single Judge dated 04.12.2019 passed in CWJC No. 03 of
2019. For the first time, the appellant is bringing notice to this Court that there is an order of Government of Bihar dated 17.05.1997 vide Letter No. 11/R3-305/97-980/ to follow certain directions.
Communication dated 17.05.1997 reads as under:-
"fcgkj ljdkj fuca/ku foHkkx i=kad&11@vkj 3& 305@97&980@ iVuk] fnukad 17-5-97 izs"kd] Jh fot; dqekj oekZ] lfpo&lg&fuca/ku egkfujh{kd fcgkj] iVukA lsok esa] ftyk fuca/kd ¼lHkh½@ftyk voj fuca/kd ¼lHkh½ A fo"k; % xSj et:vk Hkwfe dk vfu;fer gLrkUrj.k fd;s tkus ds laca/k esaA egk'k;] mijksDr fo"k; ds laca/k esa dguk gS fd dqN txgksa ls xSj et:vk Hkwfe dk gLrkukUrj.k foys[kksa dk fuca/ku gsrq Lohdkj fd;s tkus dh lwpuk izkIr gqbZ gSA bl laca/k esa KkrO; gS fd xSj et:vk vke ;k xSj et:vk [kk'k dh Hkwfe dk vf/kdkj fdlh Hkh O;fDr dks cUnkscLrh ds }kjk fn;k tkrk gSA fdUrq ml O;fDr dks cUnkscLrh ls izkIr Hkwfe dks vxj cspk ;k gLrkUrfjr fd;k tkrk gS rks ;g vfu;fer dk;Z gS rFkk fdlh fuca/ku inkf/kdkjh ds }kjk ;fn ,slh
Patna High Court L.P.A No.634 of 2021 dt.04-03-2025 3/3 Hkwfe dk fodz; foys[k ;k gLrkUrj.k foys[k gsrq Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS rks ;g fu;ekuqdwy ugha gksxkA vr% vkils vis{kk dh tkrh gS fd ,sls ekeyksa esa iwjh lko/kkuh cjrh tk;s ,oa cUnkscLrh ls izkIr fdlh Hkh xSj et:vk Hkwfe dk fodz; foys[k ;k gLrkukUrj.k nLrkost fuca/ku gsrq Lohdkj u fd;k tk,A fo'oklHkktu] g0@&vLi"V ¼fot; dqekj oekZ½"
6. This document was not apprised before the learned Single Judge and for the first time it is pointed out in the present Letters Patent Appeal. Therefore, it is not a fit case for filing of Letters Patent Appeal. On the other hand, Appellants-State have remedy of filing civil review before the learned Single Judge. Accordingly, the present Letters Patent Appeal stands disposed of reserving liberty to the appellants to prefer civil review petition. Vikash/- (P. B. Bajanthri, J) (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date Transmission Date N/A