IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Jasmeet Kaur State of Haryana CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: - NAMIT KUMAR, J. 1. BNSS, 2023 for directing respondents respondent No.5 as per representation dated 04.11.2024 (Annexure P3). 2. Singh, submits that the alleged representation dated 04.11.2024 (Annexure P3) has not been rece of Police, Kurukshetra. petitioner has under Section 175(3) of the BNSS, 2023 the Hon’ble Supreme Court in and others, (2008) 2 Supreme Court Cases 409 3. with liberty to the petitioner to avail alternati with law. 14.07.2025 R.S. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-30949 Date of decision Jasmeet Kaur Versus Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate, Ms. Gaganpreet Kaur, DAG, Haryana. NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 for directing respondents No.1 to 4 to take action against respondent No.5 as per representation dated 04.11.2024 (Annexure P3). Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Jiya Singh, submits that the alleged representation dated 04.11.2024 (Annexure P3) has not been received in the office of the Superintendent of Police, Kurukshetra. She further submits that even otherwise, the petitioner has an alternative remedy for redressal of her grievances under Section 175(3) of the BNSS, 2023 in view of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others, (2008) 2 Supreme Court Cases 409 In this view of the matter, present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail alternati Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 30949 of 2025 Date of decision: 14.07.2025 ......Petitioner ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR for the petitioner. Ms. Gaganpreet Kaur, DAG, Haryana. This petition has been filed under Section 528 of the No.1 to 4 to take action against respondent No.5 as per representation dated 04.11.2024 (Annexure P3). Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Jiya Singh, submits that the alleged representation dated 04.11.2024 ived in the office of the Superintendent She further submits that even otherwise, the an alternative remedy for redressal of her grievances in view of law laid down by Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others, (2008) 2 Supreme Court Cases 409. In this view of the matter, present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail alternative remedy in accordance (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2025.07.14 17:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document