Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6573 (GAU)

AKBAR ALI TALUKDAR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

AB/190/2025 · 2025-02-27

Manash Ranjan Pathak

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010017222025 2025:GAU-AS:2116 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/190/2025 AKBAR ALI TALUKDAR S/O KUTUB UDDIN TALUKDAR VILL DUDHPATIL PART-VI P.S. SILCHAR, DIST CACHAR ,(ASSAM) VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REP BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:SRI RAM RAJ RABIDAS S/O LATE LAL MOHAN RABIDAS R/O VILLAGE DURGA NAGAR PART-I P.O. UDHARBOND DIST CACHAR (ASSAM) PIN 78803 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A H M R CHOUDHURY, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK ORDER 28-02-2025 Heard Mr. A H M R Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K. K. Parashar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. 2. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner, namely, Akbar Ali Talukdar, son Page No.# 2/2 of Kutub Uddin Talukdar, resident of Village-Dudhpatil Part-IV, P.S.-Silchar, District-Cachar has filed this pre-arrest bail application under Section 482 BNSS, 2023 seeking pre-arrest bail in Udharbond P.S. Case No. 126/2024, corresponding to G.R. No. 2014/2024, registered under Sections 137(2) BNS, 2023 read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012. 3. Mr. Choudhury, learned counsel submitted that this pre-arrest bail application has become infructuous, as in the meanwhile, the petitioner has already been arrested in said Udharbond P.S. Case No. 126/2024 and as such, he is not pressing this pre-arrest bail application. 4. Accordingly, this pre-arrest bail application being infructuous, stands dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant