AKANKSHA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
CWP/16386/2025 · 2025-05-29
Tribhuvan Dahiya
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 65720 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 65720 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-16386-2025
-1-
133
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-16386-2025
Date of Decision: 29.05.2025
AKANKSHA AND OTHERS
..... PETITIONERS VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
....RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. Balraj Singh Dhull, Advocate
for the petitioners.
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL)
The petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant relief to the petitioners in view of the
judgment dated 28.11.2023 rendered by this Court in CWP-1887-2019 titled Kalyan Singh and others v. State of Haryana and others.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before respondents. At this stage, petitioners will be satisfied in case respondent no.2 is directed to decide their legal notice, dated 01.04.2025, Annexure P-4, in a specified period, in view of the law laid down by this Court vide judgment, dated 30.09.2024, passed in CWP-14904-2024 titled Dr. Dusyant and others v. State of Haryana and another. Seema 2025.05.30 14:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-16386-2025
-2-
3.
Notice of motion.
4.
Mr. Harish Rathee, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State and submits that the pending legal notice, dated 01.04.2025, will be decided by respondent no.2/Director General, Higher Education by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, and in terms of the law laid down in Dr. Dusyant case, within three months.
5.
In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof.
6.
Ordered accordingly.
7.
In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioners.
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) 29.05.2025
JUDGE Sima Sima Sima Sima
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable
Yes/No Seema 2025.05.30 14:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document