YATENDRA KUMAR S/O SADHU RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/2066/2025 · 2025-03-03
Anil Kumar Upman
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6572 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6572 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:9159] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2066/2025 Yatendra Kumar S/o Sadhu Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Khohara, P.s. Sadar Bayana, Tehsil Bayana, District Bharatpur (At Present In Sub Jail Bayana, District Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Satyapal Poshwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 03/03/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.07/2025 registered at Police Station Bayana, District Bharatpur for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 281 & 132 of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that it is a case of no injury as no person has sustained any injury. It is submitted that false averments have been made in the FIR.
Learned counsel contends that petitioner has no criminal antecedents and he is in custody since 23.01.2025. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. Trial will take time in its conclusion.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by
[2025:RJ-JP:9159] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2066/2025] counsel for the petitioner.
4. I have considered the contentions.
5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also considering the fact that it is a case of no injury; no person has sustained any injury; absence of criminal antecedents as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application.
6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Yatendra Kumar S/o Sadhu Ram, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /326