Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6572 (KAR)

SMT. BANDI SHARADAMMA W/O LATE BANDI NAGAPPA v. SMT. BANDI JAYAMMA W/O NAGARAJ

RSA/100244/2021 · 2025-03-06

E S Indiresh

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4321 RSA No. 100244 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 100244 OF 2021 (PAR-) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. BANDI SHARADAMMA W/O. LATE BANDI NAGAPPA, AGE: ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, R/O. BANNIGOLA VILLAGE, H.B. HALLI-584125 TA: BALLARI, DIST: BALLARI. 2. SMT. BANDI RAMANJALI, W/O. ANANDAPPA, D/O. BANDI NAGAPPA, AGE: ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC: ANGANWADI TEACHER, R/O. TIMMALAPUR-583134, TA: HOSPET, DIST: BALLARI. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. M.M. PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. BANDI JAYAMMA W/O. NAGARAJ, AGE: ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, R/O. RAMANAGARA-583212, KEB OFFICE LANE, H.B. HALLI, DIST: BALLARI. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. MANJUNATH JADAI, ADVOCATE) THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF C.P.C., PRAYING TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI, IN R.A.NO.56/2016 VIDE ORDER DATED 26.08.2020 AND CONFIRM THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, H.B. HALLI IN O.S. NO.158/2012 VIDE ORDER DATED 24.10.2016, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.03.07 16:18:45 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4321 RSA No. 100244 of 2021 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo dated 06.03.2025 and submitted that the appellants are not interested to pursue the appeal. The memo is taken on record and accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. In view of disposal of the appeal, pending interlocutory applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and are disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE YAN CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9