Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65716 (MAD)

KALAISELVAN v. The Superintendent of Police

WP Crl./137/2025 · 2025-07-01

P Velmurugan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.Crl.No.137 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :01.07.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN W.P.Crl.No.137 of 2025 Kalaiselvan ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police, Superintendent of Police office, Mayiladuthurai District. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Deputy Superintendent of Police Office, Seerazhi. 3. The Inspector of Police, Pudhupattinam Police Station, Pudhupattinam. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to delete the petitioner's name from the history sheet rowdy list on the basis of the petitioner's representations dated 16.2.2024 and 20.3.2024 within a time frame. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Senthilvel For Respondents : Dr.C.E.Pratap Government Advocate (Crl.Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.No.137 of 2025 O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to delete the petitioner's name from the history sheet rowdy list on the basis of the petitioner's representations dated 16.2.2024 and 20.3.2024 within a time frame. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent- Police and perused the materials available on record. 3. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent-Police submitted that the third respondent-Police registered a case against the petitioner in Crime No.136 of 2022 for the offences under Sections 147, 354A, 506(2) of the IPC and Section 10, 9(g) and 9(m) of the Protection of Child from Sexual Offences Act. Hence, the petitioner's name has been included in the history sheet. He further submitted that respondent-Police will consider the petitioner's representation. Page 2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.No.137 of 2025 4. On a perusal of the records, it is seen that the petitioner involved in only one case ie., in Spl.S.C.No.119 of 2024 on the file of the learned District Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai. Except that case, no other case is pending against the petitioner. 5. In view of the above, the respondent-Police is directed to consider the petitioner's representations dated 16.2.2024 and 20.3.2024 and pass suitable orders on merits and in accordance with law. 6. With the abovesaid direction, the Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. 01.07.2025 mfa Index:Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.No.137 of 2025 To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Superintendent of Police office, Mayiladuthurai District. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Deputy Superintendent of Police Office, Seerazhi. 3. The Inspector of Police, Pudhupattinam Police Station, Pudhupattinam. 4 . The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Chennai. Page 4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.No.137 of 2025 P.VELMURUGAN, J mfa W.P.Crl.No.137 of 2025 01.07.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis