Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65715 (KAR)

MUBARAK v. MANOHARSA

MFA/102152/2015 · 2025-08-30

Ashok S Kinagi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11136 MFA No. 102152 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 102152 OF 2015 (MV-I) BETWEEN: 1. MUBARAK S/O IBRAHIMSAB TAHASILDAR, AGE: 18 YEARS, OCC: GOUNALI WORK, R/O: 5TH CROSS, NANDIGUDDE ROAD, MALEBENNUR VILLAGE, TQ: HARIHAR DIST: DAVANAGERE, NOW AT MARUTHINAGAR, RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. ANJANEYA M, ADV) AND: 1. MANOHARSA S/O NAGASA LADWA, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: LADWA STREET HARIHAR, TQ: HARIHAR, DIST: DAVANAGERE. 2. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., A.M. ARCADE NEAR VIDHYARTHI BHAVAN, C.G. HOSPITAL ROAD, DAVANAGERE. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRIYUTHS. M.H. PATIL & HARSHAWARDHAN M PATIL, ADVS FOR R1, SRI. RAJASHEKAR S. ARANI, ADV FOR R2) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT 1988, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & AWARD DATED:13.04.2015, PASSED IN MVC. NO.452/2013, ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MEMBER, ADDL. MACT, RANEBENNUR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: VIJAYALAKSHMI M KANKUPPI Digitally signed by VIJAYALAKSHMI M KANKUPPI Date: 2025.09.04 15:22:38 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11136 MFA No. 102152 of 2015 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI) Learned counsel for respondent No.1 has filed a memo stating that the matter is settled between the parties before the Executing Court in Execution No.449/2015 and produced the copy of the order sheet of Execution No.449/2015. Learned counsel for appellant does not dispute the same. As the parties have settled the dispute before the executing Court, in view of the same, nothing survives for consideration in this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as having become infructuous. SD/- (ASHOK S. KINAGI) JUDGE NAA CT: BSB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7