1 30 ca.5584.25.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. 30 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5584 OF 2025 IN FAST/25632/1999 TAMANAPPA MALIKARJUNAPPA PATRIKE VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. M. D. Narwadkar. AGP for Respondent / State : Mr. S. B. Jadhav. ... CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 17th November, 2025. P.C.: 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2 This is an application for condonation of delay of 2988 days caused in filing the first appeal. 3 The learned AGP strongly opposed the application and submitted that there is no sufficient reason to condone the delay. 4 On perusal of the application, it appears that the delay has not been deliberately caused. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the delay deserves to be condoned on certain conditions. 5 For the reasons stated in the application, the delay stands condoned. The application stands allowed in the interest of justice. The appeal be registered. 2025:BHC-AUG:31628 2 30 ca.5584.25.odt 6 It is made clear that in case the amount of compensation is enhanced, the appellants shall not be entitled for the amount of interest and other statutory benefits for the delayed period. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] nga