CRWP-5832 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (111) Abhishek Sharma State of Punjab and Ors. CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN, 1. Constitution mandamus, directing the respondents to restore security to the petitioner in light of the perceived threat and previous attacks. 2. petition but prays that the representation dated 15.05.2025 (Annexure P submitted to the Commissioner of Police, Amritsar City, as well as the Additional Director General of Police (Security), Punjab, Chandigarh, be considered in accordance with the law. 3. 4. accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents and submits that the representation 5832-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Abhishek Sharma Versus State of Punjab and Ors. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Samdisha Kaur, Asst. A.G., Punjab. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to restore security to the petitioner in light of the perceived threat and previous attacks. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present tition but prays that the representation dated 15.05.2025 (Annexure P submitted to the Commissioner of Police, Amritsar City, as well as the Additional Director General of Police (Security), Punjab, Chandigarh, be considered in accordance with the law. Notice of motion. Ms. Samdisha Kaur, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents and submits that the representation shall be duly considered in accordance with the law and 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-5832-2025 Date of Decision:- 02.06.2025 ……Petitioner ……Respondents ALOK JAIN Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate for the petitioner. . Samdisha Kaur, Asst. A.G., Punjab. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the of India, seeking the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to restore security to the petitioner in light of the perceived threat and previous attacks. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present tition but prays that the representation dated 15.05.2025 (Annexure P-5), submitted to the Commissioner of Police, Amritsar City, as well as the Additional Director General of Police (Security), Punjab, Chandigarh, be . Samdisha Kaur, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents and submits that the be duly considered in accordance with the law and 1 02.06.2025 ……Petitioner ……Respondents The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the of India, seeking the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to restore security to the petitioner in Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present 5), submitted to the Commissioner of Police, Amritsar City, as well as the Additional Director General of Police (Security), Punjab, Chandigarh, be . Samdisha Kaur, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents and submits that the be duly considered in accordance with the law and MANJU 2025.06.03 13:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-5832 decided accordingly. 5. view of the statement made by learned counsel for the State, the disposed of with (Annexure P Police (Security), Punjab, Chandigarh request of the petitioner, made (Annexure P 6. June 02, 2025 manju 5832-2025 decided accordingly. Though finding no merit in the present petition, however, i view of the statement made by learned counsel for the State, the disposed of with a liberty to petitioner to pursue his representation (Annexure P-5) before respondent No.2-Additional Direct Police (Security), Punjab, Chandigarh, who shall request of the petitioner, made vide representation dated 15.05.2025 (Annexure P-5), and take appropriate action in accordance with the law. Disposed of. June 02, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No 2 ugh finding no merit in the present petition, however, in view of the statement made by learned counsel for the State, the same is a liberty to petitioner to pursue his representation Additional Director General of who shall take into consideration the representation dated 15.05.2025 5), and take appropriate action in accordance with the law. (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 2 n is a liberty to petitioner to pursue his representation or General of take into consideration the representation dated 15.05.2025 MANJU 2025.06.03 13:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document