Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6570 (CHH)

INDRAJEET SINGH v. RAJENDRA KUMAR PANDEY

CONT/193/2025 · 2025-02-12

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:CGHC:7576 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CONT No. 193 of 2025 Indrajeet Singh S/o Late Shrikartar Singh Aged About 60 Years R/o Quarter No. 1/a, Street No. 7, Sector 2, Bhilai District Durg Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - Rajendra Kumar Pandey Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Bhilai, District Durg,Chhattisgarh 2-Richa Prakash Choudhary Collector, Durg Chhattisgarh 3 - Narendra Kumar Banjare Deputy Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh 4 - Devendra Kumar Verma Estate Officer, Municipal Corporation Bhilai District Durg,Chhattisgarh 5 - Deepesh Kumar Nathwani S/o Shri Mansukh Lal Nathwani Aged About 50 Years R/o Ews 699, Vaishali Nagar, Supela Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh ... Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. Prateek Singh Thakur, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Deputy Adv. General ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 12.02.2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties, perused the record with utmost circumspection. 2. The instant contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner herein, alleging non-compliance of the Court’s order dated 12.09.20224 passed in WP(C) No. 4570 of 2024. 3. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, I deem it appropriate to give one opportunity to the respondents/contemnors to ensure compliance of order dated 12.09.2024 passed by this Court. 4. The respondents shall ensure the compliance of this Court’s order dated 12.09.2024 within 60 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid direction, the contempt case stands finally disposed off. 6. No order as to cost(s). sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge @lfiz@