Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 657 (UTT)

HASEEN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/9/2025 · 2025-01-07

Alok Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Anticipatory Bail Application No. 9 of 2025 Haseen ...Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….Respondent Present:- Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Pankaj Joshi, A.G.A. for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant seeks anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 05 of 2025, under Sections 3, 5, 11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007, Police Station Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. According to the FIR, on 02.01.2025, police raided a premises and recovered beef and other articles, but the applicant managed to escape. 4. It is the case of the applicant that co-accused has named the applicant as the person, who was also involved in the offence. 5. Learned State Counsel would submit that no separate objection is required to be filed, as such. The anticipatory bail application may be decided based on the material available on record. He would submit that when the police reached at the spot, the applicant managed to escape. 2 6. Having considered, this Court is of the view that this is a case, in which the applicant should be granted anticipatory bail. The instant anticipatory bail application deserves to be allowed. 7. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. 8. In the eventuality of arrest, the applicant shall be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer (“AO”). In addition to it, the applicant shall also comply with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall co-operate with the investigation. (ii) The applicant shall not approach any witness in any manner, whatsoever. (iii) The applicant shall not leave the country without prior permission of the court concerned. (iv) The applicant shall deposit his passport with the AO. The passport may only be returned by the order of the court concerned. In case the applicant does not have passport, he shall give an undertaking to that effect to the AO. (v) The applicant shall also give an undertaking on (i), (ii) & (iii) above. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 07.01.2025 Ravi Bisht RAVI BISHT Digitally signed by RAVI BISHT DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=ded921477e34a304cbcb0b52d4a59f37e6d2018d38d0b66 9a5c068799391e6bb, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=AA64B1F44E60E652AE5485ED764961E4E52FD29C6 F03C20917020ED093405536, cn=RAVI BISHT Date: 2025.01.07 20:56:55 +05'30'