HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 47567 of 2023 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. Heard Shri Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicants, Shri Avinash Chandra Yadav, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and Shri J.P. Singh, learned AGA for the State. 2. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred for quashing of the entire proceedings, including proceedings of Criminal Case No.4253 of 2024 (State Vs. Manoj Kumar Shukla and others), arising out of Case Crime No.283 of 2017, under Sections 323, 325, 342, 506 IPC, P.S. Govind Nagar, District Kanpur Nagar, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the same has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding the same is on the record. It is further submitted that there is a cross case also and in that case compromise has been arrived at between the parties. It is further submitted that the injuries sustained by the injured are not dangerous to life. Learned counsel for the applicants further prays that in view of the compromise entered into between the applicants and opposite party no.2, the proceeding of the aforesaid case be quashed. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Avinash Chandra Yadav, G.A. Manoj Kumar Shukla And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 5. In view of the fact that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on the record and taking note of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed, in respect of the applicants. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the aforesaid, the impugned charge-sheets/cognizance- summoning order and entire proceedings of Case Crime No.283 of 2017, under Sections 323, 325, 342, 506 IPC, P.S. Govind Nagar, District Kanpur Nagar, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar, against the applicants, are hereby quashed. 7. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is allowed. September 24, 2025 RKM A482 No. 47567 of 2023 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad