KOKILABAI TUKARAM PATIL AND ORS v. MUSTAFA MOHD. SAMI CHAUDHARI AND ANR
CA/2395/2023 · 2025-10-16
Shri Shailesh P Brahme
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 65686 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 65686 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 13 ca 2395.23 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2395 OF 2023 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1471 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 30916 OF 2017 Kokilabai Tukaram Patil and others .. Applicants Versus Mustafa Mohd. Sami Chaudhari and another .. Respondents Shri Madhav M. Bhokarikar, Advocate for the Applicants. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2396 OF 2023 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1473 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 30914 OF 2017 Kavsabai Jagannath Mhaske Since deceased through L.Rs. Sumanbai and others .. Applicants Versus Mustafa Mohd. Sami Chaudhari and another .. Respondents Shri Madhav M. Bhokarikar, Advocate for the Applicants.
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 16TH OCTOBER, 2025.
FINAL ORDER : . The respondent No. 1 is unable to be served through regular mode of service. Applicants can be permitted to serve the 2025:BHC-AUG:29536
2 13 ca 2395.23 respondent No. 1 by substituted mode of service.
2. The civil applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause 'c'. The civil applications are disposed of.
[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME J. ] bsb/Oct. 25