Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6567 (MAD)

M/s CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION v. M/s SINO IMPORT AND EXPORT PRIVATE LIMITED

CRP/6032/2025 · 2026-06-10

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C.R.P.No.6032 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10.06.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE C.R.P.No.6032 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.29801 of 2025 M/s.Central Warehousing Corporation, No.4, North Avenue, Srinagar Colony, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.M/s.SINO Import and Export Private Limited, 385, 4th Floor, RMV 2nd Stage, 2nd Block, 80 Feet Road, Sanjaynagar, Bangalore – 560 094. 2.M/s.M.S.T.C.Limited, Southern Regional Office, Ispat Bhavan, 3rd Floor, No.5, Kodambakam High Road, Chennai – 600 034. ... Respondents Prayer : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying to allow the present civil revision petition, set aside the Impugned Docket Order dated 12.11.2025 passed by the Principal Commercial Court, Chennai in C.O.S.No.375 of 2025. Page No.1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.No.6032 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.M.S.Seshadri For Respondents : Mr.K.Jeyachandran [R1] Mr.C.Vijayakumar [R2] ***** ORDER This Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the impugned docket order, dated 12.11.2025 passed by the Principal Commercial Court, Chennai in C.O.S.No.375 of 2025. 2. The impugned docket order, dated 12.11.2025 reads as follows :- “Both side counsels present. Memo filed to refer to Mediation. Hence this suit is referred to Mediation call on 12.12.2025.” 3. The contention of the petitioner before this Court in this revision is that the 1st respondent having not instituted pre-suit mediation, the impugned order passed by the commercial court is erroneous and not in accordance with law. The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, would also submit that the petitioner is not willing to go for mediation as per the impugned order. On the other hand, the learned Page No.2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.No.6032 of 2025 counsel for the 1st respondent/plaintiff is willing to go for mediation as per the impugned order. 4. Since the petitioner is not willing to go for mediation as per the impugned order, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of by directing the trial court to dispose of the suit in C.O.S.No.375 of 2025, on merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the maintainability of the suit in C.O.S.No.375 of 2025 in this revision. The interim stay already granted by this Court shall stand vacated. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 10.06.2026 Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No sp To The Principal Commercial Court, Chennai. Page No.3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.No.6032 of 2025 ABDUL QUDDHOSE , J. sp C.R.P.No.6032 of 2025 10.06.2026 Page No.4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis