- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14372 WP No. 84292 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 84292 OF 2013 (S-RES) BETWEEN: 1. M.SHEKSHAVALI S/O. LATE K KHAJA HUSSAIN SAB, AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC:HELPER, TOWN PANCHAYATH OFFICE, KAMALAPURA, R/AT: WARD NO. 1 ,P R CAMP, KAMALAPUR, TQ:HOSPET, DIST: BALLARI. 2. M. SIKANDAR S/O. LATE MARDAN SAB, AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC: POURA KARMIKA, R/O. DOOR NO. 333, 11TH WARD, KUNTE AREA, KAMALAPURA, TQ:HOSPET, DIST: BALLARI. 3. K. SRIKANTH S/O. LATE H HONNURAPPA , AGE: 25 YEARS, OCC: ATTENDER, R/O. 16TH WARD, INDIRANAGAR, HOSPET, DIST: BALLARI. 4. RAMESH S/O. GANGAPPA , AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC: POURA KARMIKA, R/O. CHAPPARADAHALLI, 5TH WARD, KAMALAPURA, TQ:HOSPET, DIST: BALLARI …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SIDDAPPA SAJJAN, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14372 WP No. 84292 of 2013 AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER , DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, V. V. TOWER, BANGALORE – 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER , BELLARI DISTRICT, BELLARI. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, TQ: HOSPET, BELLARI DISTRICT, BELLARI. 4. THE CHIEF OFFICER, TOWN PANCHAYAT KAMALAPUR, HOSPET TALUK, DIST: BALLARI. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. GODE NAGARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R4; SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS PERTAINING TO ORDER DATED 09/11/2012 IN PÀA/ªÀÄÄ- 3/¹§âA¢/75/2012-18, , ORDER PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.2.. ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER DATED:09/11/2012 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.2, VIDE ANNEXURE-C. ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO REINSTATE THE PETITIONERS TO THEIR RESPECTIVE POSITIONS AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING B GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14372 WP No. 84292 of 2013 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the petition has rendered infrucutous as the grievance of the petitioner is redressed, as the petitioners have been reinstated into service. In the light of the said submission, the petition is didsposed as having become infrucutous reserving liberty to the petitioner to seek its revival in the event the information so made is contrary to the record. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE RSH/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 273