IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (103) CWP-16342-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : August 06, 2025 Rajesh Kumar Malik .. Petitioners Versus Union of India and others .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. Vijay Dahiya, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. S.K. Sharma, Sr. Panel Counsel, for respondent-UOI. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL) 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the original application filed by the petitioner has been dismissed on the ground of jurisdiction and even as of now, the remedy before this Court exists to claim the said benefit, the present writ petition may kindly be dismissed as having been not pressed any further with liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy before this Court for the redressal of his grievance. 2. Ordered accordingly. 3. Civil miscellaneous application pending if any, also stands disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE August 06, 2025 (VIKAS SURI) harsha JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No HARSHA RANI 2025.08.08 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document