Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65634 (KAR)

MR MOHAN ALIAS BAVUKANNA S/O RAMA SABREKAR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/103079/2025 · 2025-08-18

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10380 WP No. 103079 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 103079 OF 2025 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: MR. MOHAN @ BAVUKANNA S/O. RAMA SAMBREKAR, AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. 2ND CROSS, MAHALAXMI NAGAR, GANESHPUR, TAL. AND DIST. BELAGAVI-591108. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHADAB HASANSAB YADAWAD, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, 2ND FLOOR, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (1 & O) AND SPECIAL EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE, BELAGAVI-590001. 3. THE POLICE INSPECTOR CAMP POLICE STATION, BELAGAVI-590001. 4. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE BELAGAVI CITY, BELAGAVI-590016. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA FOR R1 TO R4) Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10380 WP No. 103079 of 2025 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO I) TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED. 29/03/2025 BEARING NO. MAG/G.PA/08/2025 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2. II. ISSUE ANY OTHER WRIT OR DIRECTION AS DEEMED FIT BY THIS HON’BLE COURT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: i) To quash the impugned order dated. 29/03/2025 bearing no. MAG/G.PA/08/2025 produced at Annexure-A passed by the Respondent No.2. ii) Issue any other Writ or direction as deemed fit by this Hon’ble Court. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in view of the subsequent developments, the petition has become infructuous. 3. The submission is placed on record. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE VB/Ct:pa/LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 12