Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:109277 Court No. - 77 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 20467 of 2025 Applicant :- Jishan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohammad Faisal Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Present application has been preferred with prayer to direct the learned court below to permit the applicant to execute one personal bond and two sureties each in like amount to the satisfaction of the court below and the same bond/sureties would hold good for all seven cases as in Case Crime nos. 82/2022, 230/2022, 189/2024, 138/2024, 145/2024, 82/2024 and 243 of 2024. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for applicant sought the direction of this Court in shape of instructing the trial court to permit two sureties for all seven cases wherein, applicant has already been enlarged on bail. 4. Per contra, learned AGA vehemently opposed the prayer sought through the instant application. 5. During the course of argument a precise query has been raised before learned counsel for applicant that whether applicant has ever preferred the bail bond in pursuance to the aforesaid cases wherein he has been enlarged on bail and if so, whether there is a specific denial from learned trial court in shape of asking separate sureties for separate cases. In response to the query, learned counsel for applicant fairly submitted that applicant never preferred any bail bond in pursuance to any of aforesaid cases in which he has been enlarged on bail and there is no specific denial from learned trial court concerned. 6. In view of aforementioned discussions and after perusing the records, this Court finds that no prejudice has been caused to the applicant as applicant never intended to prefer bail bonds in pursuance to first bail order dated 24.09.2024 passed in Case Crime no. 82 of 2024 by learned court concerned, although thereafter till 20.05.2025 applicant has already been extended bail in consecutive7 cases but at no point of time he intended to prefer bail bonds and as such there is hardly any denial available in record with regard to two surety in each and ever bail bond. Hence, no cause of action arises in favour of applicant to pursue the instant application. 7. The instant application stands dismissed accordingly. Order Date :- 9.7.2025 Shaswat Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad