IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53301 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2025 Thana- LAUKARIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Haroon Siddiquee @ Harun siddiki S/o Late Habib Siddiquee @ Haviv Siddiquee Village -Pipradih, PS- Laukariya, Distt.- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Milind Kumar Mishra, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 11-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Laukariya P.S. Case No. 57 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 274, 317(4), 318(4), 61(2)(b), 3(5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. As per prosecution case, on the basis of secret information, six drums each containing 200 litre (total 1200 litre) mixed petrol like liquid substance and other apparatus were recovered from a hut situated beside the house of the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR and he has falsely been implicated in this Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53301 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 2/3 case due to dirty village politics. Petitioner is in custody since 21.05.2025 and bears no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel further submits that from perusal of the FIR itself, it is clear that no incriminating article has been recovered either from conscious possession or house of the petitioner rather the same has been recovered from the hut situated beside the house of the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner is not owner of the land on which the alleged hut was situated. He further submits that when raid was conducted by the police at that time the petitioner was working in the field in which vegetables were planted by him but police arrested him and made accused in the present case. 5. The learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody, keeping in view clean antecedent of petitioner, argument advanced on behalf of both sides and also taking into consideration the material available on record, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bagaha, West Champaran in connection Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53301 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 3/3 with Laukariya P.S. Case No. 57 of 2025, subject to following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors shall be either father or mother or sister or brother or wife or the person who has sworn the affidavit in bail application. (ii) Petitioner will co-operate in trial and will remain present on all dates and absence for two consecutive dates without appropriate permission, would be a ground for cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself. (iii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. shahzad/- (Alok Kumar Pandey, J) U T