Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6563 (RAJ)

VIKAS @ DHOLIYA S/O DAYANANAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2092/2025 · 2025-03-03

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:9021] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. 3rd Bail Application No. 2092/2025 Vikas @ Dholiya S/o Dayananad, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Khanpur, P.s. Singhana, Dist. Jhunjhunu Raj. (Petitioner Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Upendra Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 03/03/2025 1. This third bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 71/2024 registered at Police Station Singhana, District Jhunjhunu for offences u/S 143, 451 & 323 IPC. 2. The earlier bail applications filed by the accused petitioner were dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Heard. 4. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioner. 5. Taking into consideration the allegations against the accused petitioner so also the fact that the accused petitioner has already undergone a custody of about 9 months and also the fact that charge against the accused petitioner has been framed on 12.11.2024 and the trial has not been concluded so far though the [2025:RJ-JP:9021] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2092/2025] offences alleged against the accused petitioner are triable by Magistrate, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits or demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this third bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J GAURAV SRIVASTAVA /16