Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65628 (KAR)

RAMESH HALAGALI v. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER,

WP/106486/2017 · 2025-07-12

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS AND SHRI K.L. PATIL, MEMBER WRIT PETITION NO.106486/2017 (S-KSRTC) LOK ADALAT No.411/2025 BETWEEN: RAMESH HALAGALI S/O BHIMAPPA, AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: DRIVER-CUM-CONDUCTOR, NOW AT LIGHTER JOB AT ADMN., SECTON, BAILHONGAL DEPOT, BELAGAVI DIVISION, DIST: BELAGAVI. - PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAVI HEGDE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, N.W.K.R.T.C., BELAGAVI DIVISION,BELAGAVI, DIST: BELAGAVI. 2. DEPOT MANAGER, BAILHONGAL DEPOT, N.W.K.R.T.C., BELAGAVI DIVISION, BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELAGAVI. - RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRASHANT S. HOSMANI, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 19.06.2017 BEARING NO. ªÁPÀgÀ¸Á/¨É«/¹§âA¢/1206/ VIDE ANNEXURE-K, ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN SO FAR AS PETITIONER IS CONCERNED DIRECTING HIM TO REPORT AS A CONDUCTOR AND ALSO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 15.04.2016 BEARING NO. ªÁPÀgÀ¸Á/¨É«/¹§âA¢/687/ ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 LIMITING THE PERIOD OF LIGHTER JOB FOR A PERIOD OF 6 MONTHS INSTEAD OF PERMANENTLY VIDE ANNEXURE-H, SO FAR AS PETITIONER IS CONCERNED & ETC. 2 THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT AFTER BEING REFFERED BY THE COURT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER Petitioner and representative of the respondent along with their respective learned counsels are present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, matter is settled. The parties have filed joint memo of settlement in full and final settlement of the claim. The joint memo is signed by the parties and their respective counsel accepting the terms of settlement. Same is accepted. 3. Writ petition stand disposed of in terms of the settlement arrived at by the parties. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER BVV,CT:VP 3