ASHOK MEHTA SON OF SHRI MADAN LAL MEHTA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/1170/2025 · 2025-09-10
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6561 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6561 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:36586] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1170/2025 Ashok Mehta Son Of Shri Madan Lal Mehta, Resident Of Village Ashawala, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur Metropolitan ( Raj).
4. Assistant Commissioner Of Police, Sanganer, Jaipur East (Raj).
5. S.h.o., Police Station J.d.a., Jaipur (Raj).
6. S.h.o. Police Station Pratap Nagar, Jaipur East (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP Mr. Vinod Sharma, ACP, C.O., PS Sanganer HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order 10/09/2025
1. In furtherance to the order dated 13.08.2025, Public Prosecutor pointed out that investigation in FIR No.540/2013 has been concluded and after arrest of co-accused Smt. Alka Gupta, charge-sheet has been filed before the concerned Court. The progress report of investigation dated 09.09.2025 has been placed on record, which is taken on record.
2. Sh. Vinod Sharma, ACP, deputed as Circle Officer, Police Station Sanganer, states that on the issue of non-conclusion of investigation in the impugned FIR, ACPs, SHOs & IOs, have been charge-sheeted by the Police Commissioner, under instructions of
[2025:RJ-JP:36586] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1170/2025] this Court vide order dated 13.08.2025. He made a humble request that in view of making compliance of the order of this Court and concluding the investigation in the impugned FIR, including the arrest of the co-accused- Smt. Alka Gupta, charge- sheet issued against them, may be ordered to be dropped.
3. In view of above, let all delinquent Police Personnel may submit an application before the Inquiry Officer to drop charge- sheet and in case any such application is filed, it is expected that the Inquiry Officer shall not proceed on merits and may drop the charge-sheet at this nascent stage.
4. Since the grievance of petitioner-complainant in respect of non-conclusion of investigation in the impugned FIR, stands satisfied, hence counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to raise all his legal and valid objection against the charge-sheet before the concerned Judicial Magistrate.
5. Permission is granted.
6. Accordingly, instant misc. petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.
7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/179-S