RAM NAYAN VERMA AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
A482/17167/2024 · 2025-08-12
Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar Judicial
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 65607 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 65607 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:139526 Court No. - 89 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 17167 of 2024 Applicant :- Ram Nayan Verma And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Kanhaiya Lal,Mohammed Iftekhar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sarphraj Hon'ble Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.
1. The case is taken up on mentioning.
2. Heard Sri Kanhaiya Lal,, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Sarphraj, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Sri V. P. Maurya, learned AGA for the State-opposite party no.1.
3. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred with prayer to quash the non-bailable warrant dated 08.01.2024 and cognizance/summoning order dated 10.12.2002, issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.11, Azamgarh on the charge sheet dated 05.09.2002 bearing charge sheet No.90 of 2002, registered as Case No.3258 of 2023(Old No.2929 of 2002) (State Vs. Ram Nayan Verma and others), arising out of Case Crime No.145 of 2002, under sections 323, 324, 325, 504, 506, IPC, Police Station Maharajganj, District Azamgarh, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.11, Azamgarh, including the entire proceedings of said case on the basis of compromise dated 06.03.2024.
4. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned. A report regarding verification of compromise send by the court concerned is already on the record. Learned
counsel for the applicants further prays that in view of the compromise entered into between the applicants and opposite party no.2, the proceeding of the aforesaid case be quashed.
5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above
submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants. 6 In view of the fact that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromised and said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and taking note of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed, in respect of the applicants.
7. In view of the aforesaid, the non-bailable warrant dated 08.01.2024 and cognizance/summoning order dated 10.12.2002, issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.11, Azamgarh on the charge sheet dated 05.09.2002 bearing charge sheet No.90 of 2002, registered as Case No.3258 of 2023(Old No.2929 of 2002)(State Vs. Ram Nayan Verma and others), arising out of Case Crime No.145 of 2002, under sections 323, 324, 325, 504, 506, IPC, Police Station Maharajganj, District Azamgarh, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.11, Azamgarh, including the entire proceedings of said case, are hereby quashed.
8. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is hereby allowed.
Order Date :- 13.8.2025 VKG Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad