JAI DUTT SHARMA AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/18452/2025 · 2025-07-15
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Vinod Diwakar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 65602 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 65602 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:115185-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 18452 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jai Dutt Sharma And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjeev Kumar,Shiv Kant Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- Anjali Upadhya,C.S.C. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Standing Counsel for State respondents and Mrs. Anjali Upadhya, learned counsel for Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (in short "GNIDA").
2. The petitioners herein claim allotment of 120 sq. meters developed abadi land out of their acquired land in Khasra No.809 of Village Tusyana, Pargana and Tehsil-Dadri, District-Gautam Budh Nagar.
3. Learned counsel for GNIDA has vehemently opposed the writ petition and submitted that the relief, as has been prayed for, is not amenable under the Scheme in question.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we find that the issue raised herein would require a factual enquiry. Without entering into the merits of the case, we direct that the petitioner shall file a fresh representation before the respondent authority within two weeks from today along with a copy of this order and the respondent authority is under obligation to take an expeditious decision by passing a reasoned and speaking order strictly in accordance with law, preferably within a further period of six weeks.
5. The writ petition is disposed of, accordingly. Order Date :- 16.7.2025 SP/ Digitally signed by :- SURYA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad