Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6559 (UTT)

NARESH KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C482/837/2024 · 2025-07-16

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS C482 No.837 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Sanjay Jain, learned Senior Advocate, through video conferencing, assisted by Mr. Uddhav Khanna, Advocate for the applicant. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, D.A.G. with Mr. Vikash Uniyal, B.H. for the State. 3. Mr. Sachin Veer Singh, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Vikramaditya Shah, Advocate for respondent no.3. 4. Learned counsel for the State made a statement at bar that after investigation pursuant to FIR a final report has been filed in favour of the applicant. 5. It is also informed by State counsel that not only final report has submitted, but recommendation has been made to proceed against the complainant for prosecution under Section 182 of IPC. 6. Accordingly the C482 application is dismissed as infructuous. 7. Needless to say that applicant is at liberty to take legal recourse available to him, in case need arises. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 16.07.2025 SK