CRM-M-310 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND 114 Rinki Bhatnagar State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present:- MANISHA BATRA, J. 1. Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, is for the official respondents to register a criminal case against respondents No. 4 and 5, who allegedly trespassed into t 18.04.2025 and hurled abuses to them and also to decide representat for protecting 2. writing received from SHO, Police Station City Rohtak, has submitted that on receipt of the aforesaid complaint from the petitioner been conducted by the police concerned and i No. 1 herself is an accused in FIR No. 177 dated 25.04 Sections 115, 126 and 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Police Station City Rohtak and she had given aforesaid complaint with false 31057-2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Rinki Bhatnagar and another Versus Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Apoorv Garg, Addl. A.G., Haryana. MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition, filed under Section Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, is for issuance of appropriate directions to the official respondents to register a criminal case against respondents No. 4 and 5, who allegedly trespassed into t 18.04.2025 and hurled abuses to them and also to decide representation/complaint dated 22.04.2025. The petitioners have for protecting their life and liberty at the hands of respondents No. 4 and 5. Learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana, in terms of a writing received from SHO, Police Station City Rohtak, has submitted that on receipt of the aforesaid complaint from the petitioner been conducted by the police concerned and i herself is an accused in FIR No. 177 dated 25.04 Sections 115, 126 and 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Police Station City Rohtak and she had given aforesaid complaint with false IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31057-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 25.07.2025 ...Petitioner Versus ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Apoorv Garg, Addl. A.G., Haryana. filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya issuance of appropriate directions to the official respondents to register a criminal case against respondents No. 4 and 5, who allegedly trespassed into the house of the petitioners 18.04.2025 and hurled abuses to them and also to decide their ion/complaint dated 22.04.2025. The petitioners have also prayed life and liberty at the hands of respondents No. 4 and 5. rned Additional Advocate General, Haryana, in terms of a writing received from SHO, Police Station City Rohtak, has submitted that on receipt of the aforesaid complaint from the petitioners, thorough inquiry has been conducted by the police concerned and it has been found that petitioner herself is an accused in FIR No. 177 dated 25.04.2025, registered under Sections 115, 126 and 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Police Station City Rohtak and she had given aforesaid complaint with false -1- 25 (O&M) Date of decision : 25.07.2025 ...Petitioners ...Respondents Bharatiya issuance of appropriate directions to the official respondents to register a criminal case against respondents No. 4 s on their also prayed life and liberty at the hands of respondents No. 4 and 5. rned Additional Advocate General, Haryana, in terms of a writing received from SHO, Police Station City Rohtak, has submitted that on , thorough inquiry has t has been found that petitioner .2025, registered under Sections 115, 126 and 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Police Station City Rohtak and she had given aforesaid complaint with false MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.07.28 14:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-310 allegations. Hence, the said complaint has been filed. Learned State counsel has further submitted that during inquiry, even no threat perception was found to the petitioner respondents. 3. aforesaid facts. 4. representation/complaint moved by the petitioner the official respondents after conducting through inquiry into the alleg made therein and no threat perception was found to Court finds no ground to issue any direction to the official respondents. Even otherwise, the petitioner Magistrate for initiating criminal proceedings against the private respondents. Hence, finding no merit in the present petition, the same is dismissed. 25.07.2025 Waseem Ansari Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 31057-2025 (O&M) gations. Hence, the said complaint has been filed. Learned State counsel has further submitted that during inquiry, even no threat perception was found to the petitioners or their family members at the hands of the private respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner aforesaid facts. Keeping in view the fact that the aforesaid representation/complaint moved by the petitioner the official respondents after conducting through inquiry into the alleg made therein and no threat perception was found to Court finds no ground to issue any direction to the official respondents. Even otherwise, the petitioners may file an appropriate complaint before the Area Magistrate for initiating criminal proceedings against the private respondents. Hence, finding no merit in the present petition, the same is dismissed. .07.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable gations. Hence, the said complaint has been filed. Learned State counsel has further submitted that during inquiry, even no threat perception was found family members at the hands of the private for the petitioners could not dispute the Keeping in view the fact that the aforesaid representation/complaint moved by the petitioners has already been filed by the official respondents after conducting through inquiry into the allegations made therein and no threat perception was found to their life and liberty, this Court finds no ground to issue any direction to the official respondents. Even may file an appropriate complaint before the Area Magistrate for initiating criminal proceedings against the private respondents. Hence, finding no merit in the present petition, the same is dismissed. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No -2- gations. Hence, the said complaint has been filed. Learned State counsel has further submitted that during inquiry, even no threat perception was found family members at the hands of the private could not dispute the Keeping in view the fact that the aforesaid has already been filed by ations life and liberty, this Court finds no ground to issue any direction to the official respondents. Even may file an appropriate complaint before the Area Magistrate for initiating criminal proceedings against the private respondents. MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.07.28 14:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document