Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65582 (PAT)

Md Jahid v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./52934/2025 · 2025-08-12

Purnendu Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52934 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1284 Year-2018 Thana- SAHARSA COMPLAINT CASE Dis- trict- Saharsa ====================================================== 1. Md Jahid Son of Md Salim Resident of Village- Lalu tola Ward No. 4, Sitanabad, P.S.- Bakhtiyarpur, District- Saharsa 2. Md Saddam Shah @ Md Abdul Rahman Son of Md Jasim Shah Resident of Village- Lalu tola Ward No. 4, Sitanabad, P.S.- Bakhtiyarpur, District- Saharsa 3. Md Rijvan Shah Son of Pinkori Shah @ Md Tinkori Sah Resident of Village- Lalu tola Ward No. 4, Sitanabad, P.S.- Bakhtiyarpur, District- Saharsa 4. Md Irshad Son of Alim @ Alisuddin @ Alimuddin Resident of Village- Lalu tola Ward No. 4, Sitanabad, P.S.- Bakhtiyarpur, District- Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Farida Khatoon D/o Md Jahiruddin Resident of Village- Lalu Tola Ward No. 4, Sitanabad, P.S.- Bakhtiyarpur, District- Saharsa ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kamal Kishore Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s: Mr.Lakshmi Kant Sharma, APP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 12-08-2025 Heard Mr. Kamal Kishore Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Saharsa Complaint Case No. 1284c of 2018 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 147, 148, 323, 379, 354, 376, 511/34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Considering the nature of allegation made in the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52934 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 2/2 complaint, I find that the matter can be settled amicably outside the Court. Dispute is between the family members. For trivial reason, present complaint has been lodged after a delay of more than two weeks. 4. In such circumstances, the matter is remitted back to the learned District Court. 5. The petitioners are directed to appear before the learned District Court on 19.08.2025. Till then, no coercive step shall be taken against the petitioners. In case of failure, the interim protection granted to the petitioners shall lose its force. 6. Learned District Court is directed to refer the matter before the learned Mediator of the District Mediation Centre after issuing notice to the opposite party no.2. 7. Accordingly, the present bail application stands disposed of. mantreshwar/- (Purnendu Singh, J) U T