Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:119350 Court No. - 77 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 25681 of 2025 Applicant :- Baldev Mishra And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sushil Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J. 1. Heard Sri Sushil Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for applicants and learned A.G.A for the State-respondent. 2. By means of the present application, applicant has sought quashing of the entire proceeding of Case no. 913 of 2024 (State vs. Baldev Mishra & 2 others) arising out of Case Crime no. 0233 of 2024, charge-sheet dated 07.09.2024 bearing charge-sheet no. 0192 of 2024 under Section 3/5 Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, PS- Phoolpur, District Prayagraj pending in court of Judicial Magistrate, Room no. 4, District Prayagraj. Further prayer has been made to stay the effect and operation of summoning order dated 18.11.2024 passed in Case no. 913 of 2024. 3. Brief facts of the present case are that a first information report dated 22.07.2024 bearing Case Crime No. 233 of 2024 was lodged by Revenue Inspector/opposite party no.2 in pursuance of Section 3/5 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 against applicants alleging that applicants have encroached illegally over some part of Gata No.340 which is Gram Sabha land. The applicants had, thus, caused damage and loss to the public property which is the land vested in Gram Sabha. After lodging of the FIR, the concerned Investigating Officer started inquiry and after conclusion of the same, preferred charge-sheet on dated 07.09.2024 against applicants whereupon learned court concerned has taken cognizance/summoning of offence vide order dated 18.11.2024 which impugned the present petition. 4. Learned counsel for applicant has challenged the chargesheet as well as cognizance/summoning order on several other ground inter-alia precisely on the ground that lodging of the first information report taking aid of provisions of the P.D.P.P. Act, 1984 is nothing but an abuse of process of the law, inasmuch as, the said provisions cannot be invoked to lodge a criminal case on the allegations of damage or loss caused to the Gram Sabha land. The Magistrate has acted illegally and without application of judicial mind in taking cognizance on the charge sheet submitted under Section 3/5 of the P.D.P.P. Act, 1984. 5. In any case, the question as to whether applicant had illegally encroached upon the land vested in Gram Sabha, can only be adjudicated by the Revenue Authorities. The proper proceeding for eviction of the unauthorized occupant can be undertaken under Section 67 of the Revenue Code, 2006 which is already pending against the applicants. 6. Per contra, learned AGA vehemently opposed the prayer sought through the instant petition but could not dispute the aforesaid arguments raised by learned counsel for applicant. 7. While dealing with similar issue, co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order 6.8.2020 passed in Application u/s 482 no. 9964 of 2020 (Munshi Lal and Another vs. State of U.P. and another), quashed the entire proceeding u/s 2/3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 and held that as far as criminal proceeding for illegal encroachment, damage or trespass over the land belonging to Gram Sabha is concerned, the same can be undertaken but it would be subject to the adjudication of rights of the parties over the land in dispute as the said determination can be done only by the revenue court. As far as the P.D.P.P. Act, 1984 is concerned, the same has been enacted with the specific purpose. the statement of objects and reasons of the said Act shows that it was enacted with a view to curb acts of vandalism and damage to public property including destruction and damage caused during riots and public commotion. 8. From perusal of the records, it transpires that present case is squarely covered with the judgment of co-ordinate Bench of this Court passed in Munshi Lal (supra) and as such the criminal proceedings initiated against the applicants pursuant to Section 3/5 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, cannot but be said to be an abuse of the process of law or the Court. It is also submitted that proceeding under Section 67 of U.P.Revenue Code, 2006 is already pending with regard to same dispute against the applicants, therefore, the cognizance/summoning order dated 18.11.2024 has been passed in complete ignorance of law. The continuation of criminal proceedings, in the considered opinion of the Court, being an abuse of process of the Court, ends of the justice requires that the said proceedings be quashed. 9. Invoking inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS of the High Court, entire proceedings of the Case no. 913 of 2024 (State vs. Baldev Mishra & 2 others) arising out of Case Crime no. 0233 of 2024 under Section 3/5 Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, PS- Phoolpur, District Prayagraj is hereby quashed only in respect of applicants namely Baldev Mishra, Ankit Mishra and Pawan Mishra. 10. The instant application stands allowed. Order Date :- 22.7.2025 Shaswat Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad