Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6556 (UTT)

AMARJEET SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/987/2022 · 2025-06-03

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:4449 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.987 of 2022 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Milind Raj, learned counsel for petitioner. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned A.G.A. with Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand/ respondent Nos.1 & 2. 3. Learned State Counsel made a statement at Bar on instruction that after investigation, charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner on 12.03.2024, therefore, nothing remains to be decided in these writ petitions and it has become infructuous. 4. The said fact is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner and he submits that he would challenge the said charge-sheet in appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum. 5. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, the present criminal writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, it is open to petitioner to challenge the charge-sheet in appropriate proceedings, before the appropriate forum. 6. Interim order dated 25.05.2022, stands vacated. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 03.06.2025 PN PREETI NEGI Digitally signed by PREETI NEGI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=63c75a8c4765581180a58d7478fadbe38331bac5 5c78b5f9f0276c16432f6aab, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=2BA53171893B3C3CB3CCCAE81FAE06449 8483A83D84BDB0F9229D5BF08D959AC, cn=PREETI NEGI Date: 2025.06.03 16:00:29 +05'30'